The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime on October 31, 2012. Nevertheless, the Defendant committed the instant crime (the instant crime from January 25, 2013 to April 23, 2013) at Chicago, and even though he/she was prosecuted on May 21, 2013 and was tried at the lower court, he/she prevented another Defendant from committing the same kind of crime (the instant crime from May 25, 2013 to June 4, 2013) under trial, and was discovered on June 4, 2013. The Defendant appears to have significantly lacking compliance consciousness, and the Defendant appears to have failed to expect the effect of preventing re-offending on the sole basis of the Defendant, including the fact that the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation, and environment, and the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant’s punishment is too inappropriate is too inappropriate.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.