logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.12.11 2013가합10659
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling various kinds of fruit products. 2) Defendant A entered the Plaintiff Company on January 1, 2013 and entered the Plaintiff Company with neglect and stock company on June 24, 2007 and worked as a business employee. A labor contract is deemed to have been concluded again as of January 1, 2013 following the merger between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s neglect and the stock company.

By October 2, 2013, the Plaintiff worked as a business employee at the Plaintiff’s C’s business office and was in charge of selling and collecting the price of the fruit products produced by the Plaintiff to the customer.

3) As the parents of Defendant A’s mother, Defendant A is the guarantor of Defendant A’s fidelity. (b) The Plaintiff’s bond management rules and Defendant A’s implementation note 1) set forth the bond management rules, the disciplinary action against the party involved in the claim accident, and prohibit abnormal transactions, such as dumping, selling at a discount rate exceeding the designated discount rate, selling virtual sales (the pretending to have been engaged in actual transactions, and eventually, selling in bulk through dumping), and require the violated members to compensate for damages arising therefrom.

(2) On January 1, 2013, at the time of entry into the Plaintiff, Defendant A written signature on the Company’s various regulations and a statement of compliance with the use of a mutual aid agreement (Evidence A7), and the above written statement of performance contains a statement that Defendant A would not engage in an irregular business activity for the purpose of achieving sales goals.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Entrys at Gap's 4 through 7 (including each number, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant A

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1 of the parties concerned does not pay the amount of credit which the defendant A received from the customer to the plaintiff at will.

arrow