A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site, and on June 11, 2010, the above court issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

On April 11, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.086% of blood alcohol concentration, driven Bran XG car at the 1km section from before the office where it is difficult to find out the trade name in Osan-si, Osan-si, to view the trade name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of driving under the influence of alcohol, report on the control of drinking driving, and report on the state of drinking drivers;

1. Previous for judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (a copy of summary order attached);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime again despite the fact that he had been already punished several times due to drinking driving, etc., the punishment for the crime is not less light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime.

However, the sentence shall be determined in consideration of various sentencing factors, such as the defendant's age, occupation and family environment, including the fact that the defendant is against the recognition of the crime, and the sentence of suspension of execution is to be imposed on the condition that he/she