logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.06.12 2013고정2328
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who operated D (main) on the fourth floor of the Seo-gu Seoul Building in Gwangju City.

On August 1, 2011, the Defendant concluded a partnership with the Victim Capital Co., Ltd. and lent vehicle purchase funds, and concluded a false statement that the Defendant would faithfully pay the principal and interest for the period of 36 months on the face of the week by lending KRW 18 million to the victim through a loan manager who is unable to know his name at the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, and the (State F) Office in 202.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not manufacture E.S. business at the time and did not receive any income. The deposit in the corporate passbook was used for the business fund such as purchase of machinery. On April 5, 201, while the Defendant was unable to lend 6 million won of bonds around April 5, 201, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan even if the Defendant borrowed the vehicle purchase fund from the victim, such as the lending of 6 million won of the bonds to the corporate bond manager on behalf of the corporate bond manager in 2007, which was purchased as above, around November 201.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 18 million from the victim as a vehicle purchase fund on August 1, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police and suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes in the agreement of installment financing, the register of automobiles and the register of automobiles;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above;

arrow