1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Of the costs of lawsuit, the part pertaining to the participation shall be borne by the Intervenor.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The lawsuit for damages related to aircraft noise between residents in the vicinity of the original airfield and the Osan Airfield (hereinafter “the lawsuit for damages of this case”) was initiated as indicated below. At the time of appointment of the Plaintiff as the representative attorney of the residents in the lawsuit, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) who was the representative attorney of the Plaintiff at the time of appointment of the Plaintiff as the representative attorney.

As a result of the judgment of the court of first instance on the date of the judgment of the court of second instance on the date of the judgment of the court of second instance on the case number of the plaintiff in the second instance on August 10, 2006, the original C and 3,020 others in Seoul Central District Court 2006Kahap68716, Oct. 14, 2009, some residents of Seoul Central District Court 2009Na101369, Dec. 9, 2010, the Seoul High Court dismissed the appeal of the Republic of Korea on December 9, 2010, 13,389, 206, the Seoul Central District Court 2006Da78584, Sept. 12, 2006, some residents of Seoul Central District Court 2009Na101376, Oct. 14, 2011.

B. From March 11, 201 to July 6, 2012, Korea deposited the total of KRW 17,793,000,000 for damages under the instant lawsuit claiming damages (i.e., the total of KRW 624,00,000 for damages related to the original airfield) in an overseas bank account under the Plaintiff’s name, from March 11, 201 to July 6, 2012.

C. The defendant Na

On May 2, 2014, the Plaintiff issued a revised notice of corporate tax and value-added tax on May 2, 2014, by deeming that the amount of KRW 4,012,952,227 (hereinafter “instant fees, etc.”) such as fees not paid to residents in the amount of damages indicated in the port was omitted from the amount of income.

(hereinafter “each disposition of this case”). Amount of corporate tax for the business year 2010, KRW 32,858,120, KRW 2011, KRW 1,000,300,270 for corporate tax for the business year 2010, KRW 19,50,160 for value-added tax of KRW 501,71, KRW 717,980 for 201.

D. On June 16, 2014, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with each of the instant dispositions, filed an appeal with the Tax Tribunal, but was dismissed on November 2014.

【Legal basis for recognition】