1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 5,500,000 for each of the Plaintiffs, as well as 5% per annum from September 12, 2012 to September 2, 2015; and (b).

Basic Facts

The related defendant between the parties is a company engaged in the manufacture, sale, and supply business of automobile and non-motor vehicle electronic parts, adjusted goods, and systems, etc., and after the incorporation of B as B on August 18, 1995, it was changed to C Co., Ltd. on January 31, 2002, D Co., Ltd. on February 19, 2002, E Co., Ltd. on February 15, 2007, and A Co., Ltd. on February 15, 2008, and the trade name was changed to A Co., Ltd. on December 23, 2008.

The National Metal Trade Union (hereinafter referred to as the “MMMMMM”) is a nationwide industrial trade union, the organization of which is composed of workers engaged in the nationwide metal industry and metal-related industries, and has “A branch of the National Metal Trade Union A” in the Defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as “Article 1” in comparison with Article 2 (d) below, a company-level trade union, which belongs to metal trade unions. From around 2005 to September 12, 2012, Plaintiff F and G were employed by the Defendant, and the remaining Plaintiffs are all members of the Plaintiff F and G, who are currently employed by the Defendant until they are dismissed on September 12, 2012.

On the other hand, Plaintiff F and G (hereinafter “Plaintiff F et al.”) filed with the Labor Relations Commission a petition for adjudication on unfair dismissal and unfair labor practice remedy against the Defendant’s dismissal on September 12, 2012, and recognized that the dismissal was unfair at the first instance trial, but at the reexamination stage, the dismissal was unfair.

Accordingly, Plaintiff F et al. filed an administrative litigation seeking the revocation of the Central Labor Relations Commission’s review decision as Seoul Administrative Court 2013Guhap14139, and the Defendant participated in the administrative litigation on the part of the Defendant (Chairperson of the National Labor Relations Commission).

On January 24, 2014, the Seoul Administrative Court decided that the dismissal of Plaintiff F, etc. is improper, and revoked the part concerning unfair dismissal among the decision made by the National Labor Relations Commission for review.

However, the defendant's claim on the part of unfair labor practices in the review decision is the defendant's intent to do so.