logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원거창지원 2020.09.16 2018고단70
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution against the defendant is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the representative of C in Chang-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and is an employer who employs 25 full-time workers and engages in aggregate extraction and processing business, and has not paid KRW 20,509,92, holiday work allowances, KRW 8,182,145, annual paid leave allowances, and KRW 33,57,993,93, annual paid leave allowances, and KRW 4,865,856, annual paid leave allowances, and KRW 21,970,939, KRW 3,846,868, etc., total amount of unpaid wages of E, who worked for two workers from July 15, 2013 to October 7, 2016, and did not pay KRW 59,575,80,000 within the agreed date for the payment of retirement allowances without agreement.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Articles 109 (1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and Articles 44 (1) and 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act.

(c) An expression of workers not to be punished after prosecution;

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow