1. The defendant

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 6,750,000 and as regards it, July 2019.

In full view of the facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 2's statements and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiff terminated the lease contract on November 13, 2017 on the ground that the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as "C") to the defendant on November 13, 2017, the lease deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 450,000 (prepaid on December 20, 2017), the lease period of December 20, 2017 to December 19, 2019; the defendant was in arrears from March 2018, and the plaintiff was found to have terminated the lease contract on the ground of the above overdue payment on May 21, 2019.

According to the above facts, since the above lease contract was lawfully terminated by the plaintiff's declaration of termination due to the defendant's delinquency in rent, the defendant is obligated to deliver C, which is the object of lease, to the plaintiff as a performance of the duty to restore.

In addition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the amount of 6750,000 won (450,000 won x 15 months) for the 15-month rent from March 2018 to May 2019, as well as damages for delay calculated by the rate of 12% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from July 9, 2019 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the day of delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case, and the amount of damages for delay calculated by the rate of 450,000 won per month from June 30, 2019 to the day of delivery as defined in subparagraph C.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified.