A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant is 22,00,000 won by fraud to C who is an applicant for compensation, and D who is an applicant for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 8, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and two months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Cheongju District Court. On August 13, 2009, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the Cheongju Prison.

【Criminal Facts】

"2013 Highest 1649"

1. Around 14:00 on March 23, 2010, the criminal defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim at the F cafeteria operated by the victim C in Heak-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, stating that “A victim will take out a loan of KRW 1.25 billion upon obtaining a credit guarantee certificate from the principal face and a credit guarantee certificate in terms of loan guarantee fee and fee.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim as a loan guarantee fee, he did not have the intention or ability to arrange the loan to the victim.

The defendant, from the victim, at the seat of the defendant to the Saemaul Treasury account of the defendant, 7 million won and the same year.

3. 26. 26. 8 million won in the same account, and the same year.

3. 29. Receipt of remittance of KRW 10 million to the same account, respectively;

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 25 million through three times, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On April 27, 2010, the defrauded G concluded a cargo transport contract with the victim G at the limited partnership I office of the limited partnership company I operated by the Defendant located in Cheongju-si, U.S. on April 27, 2010, the Defendant concluded a cargo transport contract with the victim G. As such, the Defendant concluded a cargo transport contract with the cargo distribution center, which would arrange a cargo transport service between Seoul and Yangsan for five years on the face of the week, such as the cost of purchase and registration of the cargo vehicle.

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim as the purchase cost and registration fee, he did not have the intent or ability to purchase the cargo vehicle to the victim and arrange the cargo transport services between Seoul and Yangsan.

On April 29, 2010, the Defendant, from the victim, at KRW 5 million with the Defendant’s Saemaul Treasury Account, and the same year.

5.4. The same year, each of which is KRW 10 million on the same account;

5.10. Receipt of remittance of KRW 20.7 million to the same account, respectively;

In this respect.