1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the following facts: there is no dispute between the parties, or evidence of No. 1 to No. 4, and evidence No. 2 to No. 7 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings.

The plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle A (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle") with respect to the vehicle B (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant vehicle").

B. On September 30, 2015, around 14:24, at the same time, there was a collision between the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle, who entered the intersection and left the road of the area of the Si/Gun/Gu (hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”), which was left to the area of the Si/Gun/Gu (hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”), by driving along the one-way traffic road from the intersection of the Korean Pharmacopoeia (in a case where there is a one-way road allowing entry after passing through the intersection between the Si/Gun/Gu road and the Si/Gun/Gu road).

C. On October 16, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,712,00 at the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in relation to the instant traffic accident.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is not responsible for the traffic accident in this case due to the negligence of the driver of the defendant vehicle who violated the duty of the front line because the driver of the vehicle who violated the duty of the front line because the plaintiff's failure to verify the plaintiff's vehicle that entered the intersection is the main cause of the traffic accident in this case. The plaintiff asserts that the driver of the defendant vehicle who violated the duty of the front line is more responsible for the traffic accident in this case, and that the defendant is more responsible for the driver of the plaintiff vehicle who entered the intersection by driving one-way road in this case due to the occurrence of traffic accident

B. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, are the left turn to the left according to the normal route of the Defendant vehicle.