Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was the general manager of the Internet shopping mall C operated by the victim B in the south of the game from around July 2010 to July 2013.

While the Defendant was running the said “D” household store after the Defendant retired, he was willing to steal the said household owned by the victim in order to sell the said household at the said household store.

1. At around 15:00 on July 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) made use of the gap in which there is no employee at the C plant located in the Namnam-si, Gyeonggi-si; (b) thereby, stolen the property equivalent to KRW 400,000,000 in the market value of the victim, which is the victim’s possession, into the cargo vehicle; and (c) stolen the property equivalent to KRW 1.4 million in the market value of the victim’s possession

2. At around 16:00 on July 16, 2013, the Defendant entered a 1.6 million won-based c logistics warehouse, on the side of which the market price is at least 1.6 million won-based c logistics warehouse, and entered two joints with an amount equal to the market price of 1.6 million won, two joints with an amount equal to 1.6 million won-based cream, two joints with an amount equal to the market price of 8,000,000 won, two joints with an amount equal to 60,000 won in the market price, six joints with an amount equal to 1.5 million won in the market price, one shock at an amount equal to 1.5 million won in the market price, two joints with an amount equal to 1.5 million won in the market price, one joints with an amount equal to 4,500,000 won in the market price, 1.5 million won in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes in question (Selection of a fine in consideration of all the circumstances, such as confession, reflectivity, initial crime, and agreement with the victim);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;