logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.04.24 2013고단2201
여객자동차운수사업법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who intends to operate a passenger transport business shall prepare a business plan and obtain a license from the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, and a person who intends to operate passenger transport business prescribed by Presidential Decree shall obtain a license

Defendant

A used the vehicle from a private-use transportation company (one-day call running company) with the trade name of "D" to carry on transportation business for customers, and Defendant B provided E-chip vehicle so that Defendant A can carry on transportation business.

From January 10, 2013 to April 17, 2013, the Defendants conspired with and without obtaining a license for passenger transport business or making registration for passenger transport business, Defendant A, at around 17:40 on the same year, transported transport of passengers from the YG car provided by Defendant B to the front road of the same Samsungdong Hyundai C&dong apartment from the Gangnam-gu, Seoul to the same time, and received KRW 10,000 in return for the transport of passengers from January 10, 2013 to the same year.

4. Until January 1, 200, a passenger transport business that received a total of KRW 6,850,000 from a total of 535 customers to the destination and operated a passenger transport business that gets profits.

2. At around 17:50 on April 1, 2013, Defendant A controlled the following grounds: (a) on the front side of the late 168 Seo-gu 1, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) on the front day of the 168 Seo-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (c) on the front day of the front day of the 168 Seo-gu

In the course of the above G and H’s repeated act of moving-out and moving-out using a dangerous object, which is an object to avoid the crackdown upon receiving a demand from the said G and H to move-out, the Defendant shocked the left-hand part of the said G with the upper left-hand part of the said G and escaped. The said G and H escape.

arrow