1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Facts of recognition

With respect to A vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

Plaintiff

차량은 2016. 12. 10. 19:42경 대전 유성구 장대동에 위치한 호남고속도로를 따라 진행하던 중 유성 톨게이트 방면으로 도로가 갈라지는 구간에서 도로 중앙 안전지대에 비상등을 켠 채 정차중이던 피고 차량의 뒤 좌측 부위를 원고 차량의 앞 우측 부위로 충격하였다

(hereinafter “instant accident”). By December 21, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 7,790,000,000, including the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident, as insurance proceeds.

[Based on the facts in the absence of dispute, the overall purport of the arguments in the judgment of the purport of Gap's statements and images, and arguments, the whole purport of each of the above evidence is as follows. The defendant vehicle repeats the direction of the vehicle while stopping in the above expressway safety zone, the defendant vehicle's direction immediately before the accident in this case was occurred, and then spons the vehicle's left side by sponsing the vehicle's lane on the plaintiff's left side. The plaintiff vehicle's sponsing the vehicle after the driver's vehicle, even though sponsing in a white line separating the safety zone from the safety zone, was found to have failed to avoid the left side and shocked by the defendant vehicle's sponsing on the left side. The plaintiff vehicle is likely to mislead the defendant vehicle in front of the parked vehicle in the road, except in exceptional circumstances such as breakdown or other inevitable reasons, and the driver of the vehicle in this case is prohibited from driving on the expressway (including Article 6 of the Road).