Defendant

B Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months of imprisonment for Defendant A, for Defendant C with prison labor for five months, and for Defendant D with prison labor for one thousand five months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B The adviser of the medical corporation G (hereinafter “G”), Defendant A as the wife of the above G, Defendant C as the head of the above G, Defendant C as the head of the above G, and Defendant D as the head of the management department of the above G, and Defendant D as the head of the above G, as the punishment of Defendant B.

1. The defendants' co-principal (the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.)) entered the He Hospital around 22:00 on June 15, 2009 and entered the Henyang-si Hospital, and the I leave the said building as the trustee operator of the above convalescent hospital.

Even after receiving the Gu, the Gu did not comply with it.

2. Defendants B and A’s joint criminal conduct (occupational embezzlement) entrusted with the said convalescent in accordance with the consignment operation agreement regarding the said convalescent hospital between the victim and G, and they embezzled the said I as a new trustee of the said convalescent hospital upon the expiration of the said contract period on May 31, 2009, by having the employees and employees of the said convalescent hospital arbitrarily transfer the medical devices indicated in the attached Table, such as one of the inter-functional test equipment owned by the said convalescent hospital from June 6, 2009 to August of the same month.

If more than the above convalescent hospital is a hospital affiliated with the Mineyang-si, which is not a G ownership (the accounts of G are inevitably different from the accounts of G), the above convalescent hospital purchased the attached articles from G with the loan from G, it is reasonable to view that the said convalescent hospital belongs to the ownership of the opticalyang-si, as claimed by the Defendants.

In light of the overall purport of Article 6(3) main text and proviso and Article 10(2) of the entrustment contract of the said convalescent hospital concluded between G and G, G’s proprietary property (Article 10(2) or leased from a third party) among the facilities and equipment acquired after G was entrusted with the said convalescent hospital.