Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a director of the victim's clan D's clan (hereinafter referred to as "victim's clan")'s Embry (hereinafter referred to as "Embry") who is the chairperson of the Embry, and the F, the chairperson of the Embry, is a penalty.
The victims of the clans are six members of the clans comprised of H, I, J, K, L, and M, the descendants of G around 1968, and the Escop is a similar clan organization comprised of persons residing in the N of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and N of Si/Gun/Gu around 1930 among the above Hmp members and the Kmp members of the Escop around 1930.
From July 10, 1974, the injured clan owned 8 lots of land (the total area of 13,790 square meters; hereinafter “instant land”) in Sinposi, Qu, R, S, T, U,V, and W (hereinafter “instant land”) under its own name. The said land was purchased in E, and owned in its name from September 7, 1968. The name of the owner was changed from July 10, 1974 to the injured clan.
The above F filed a lawsuit (U.S. District Court Decision 2010Kahap2751, Jun. 10, 1974, hereinafter referred to as the “instant civil lawsuit lawsuit”) claiming the cancellation of the registration of change of the name of the victim on the ground that the land in this case was owned by the Ethical Eth and Ethical Ethical Estical Estical Estical Estical Estical Estical Estical Estically separate from the victim’s clan, which was registered for change of the name in the future of the victim’s clan.
When the defendant was served with a complaint on behalf of the chairperson of the clan, he/she shall conduct litigation related to the disposal of the property of the clan in accordance with the rules and regulations of the clan, notwithstanding his/her occupational duty to determine the contents of such litigation, he/she shall be present at the first day for pleading on July 16, 2010, in violation of his/her duty and arbitrarily recognize his/her assertion of the plaintiff, while he/she shall be present at the first day for pleading on August 13, 2010, and thus, he/she has become final and conclusive on September 14, 2010.