1. The Defendant: KRW 547,435,157; KRW 3,00,000; KRW 10,000,000; and Plaintiff E.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is a person working for the Defendant Company from July 1, 2006 to around July 1, 2006. At the time of the accident, the Plaintiff was in charge of managing the site and safety under the team leader H with respect to civil engineering work among G bridge repair work ordered by the Korea Highway Corporation. (2) On July 14, 2008, at around 11:31, 208, the Plaintiff came from the bottom of the Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about how much the I high-tension line (2,905) passing through G along the lower side of the bridge, and accordingly, the Plaintiff’s international high-tension line (22,905) was separated from the lower side of the bridge to verify whether the work person can work in the space between the lower part of the bridge and the high-tension line.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff suffered from the instant accident such as the three degrees of visual images, scams, and scams, three degrees of portraits, excluding images, fingers, and fingers, and three degrees of portraits, the right-hand scam cuttings, the cutting of the left-hand scams, the cutting of any qualitative mental disorder, low oxygen cerebral brain damage, the scambromatic dementia, the cutting of the parts to be issued by the Defendant, and the neutic neutical boms, etc.

3) Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C and D are the parents of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff E and F are the siblings of Plaintiff E and F. [Grounds for recognition]. The facts that Plaintiff A did not dispute, and the entries of Plaintiff A’s evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and 11 (including paper numbers, and the purport of the whole pleadings).

B. As an incidental duty under the good faith principle accompanying an employment contract, an employer bears the duty to take necessary measures, such as improving the human and physical environment so that an employee does not harm life, body, and health in the course of providing his/her labor, and thereby violating such duty to protect an employee.