A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2007, the Defendant issued, at the Seoul Central District Court, a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, a fine of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on May 21, 2008, a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on July 24, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Western District Court on July 24, 2008.

As above, the Defendant, who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice, driven BKan-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. Report on the circumstances of driving at home, report on the circumstances of the driver at home, and report on the results of regulating drinking;

1. Making teas;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiries about criminal history, investigation reports (the confirmation of the previous history), and application of the statutes governing summary orders;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order of Education: The punishment as ordered is determined by comprehensively taking account of the following factors: (a) the fact that an order to attend a lecture or an order to provide community service needs to be strictly punished in light of the risk of drinking driving; (b) the fact that the record of the punishment of a fine for the same kind of crime was three times, which is favorable to the fact that driving of the instant drinking: The fact that there is no traffic accident caused by driving of the instant drinking; (c) the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than the suspension of execution; and (d) the fact that there is no motive and background of the crime; (d) the degree of alcohol