The defendant shall be innocent.

The Defendant, while working as the team leader of the Cowewa Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd., who was in charge of the product management work used by the customers of the said company, was cut off by taking out one gold 18K infant cm and gold cm of 500,000 won at the home of the victim E in Boan-si around December 2012, 201, when inspecting the air condition of the said company used by the victim, and entering a small room by taking advantage of the gaps of the victim's surveillance negligence, and taking off one gold cm and gold cm of 18K infant cm of 50,000 won at the market price owned by the victim.

Judgment

A. Although the Defendant did not have direct evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant stolen one of the instant gold bars for young children E and one of the gold sheet, according to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor, the Defendant was in custody of the said gold sheet and the gold sheet in the Defendant’s house, and the name and contact point of the victim’s children were indicated in the said gold sheet and gold sheet, and the Defendant was in custody without return to the victim even though he was aware that the said gold sheet and gold sheet were the victims.

In light of these circumstances, it is doubtful that the defendant was not guilty of the victim's above gold boom and gold brushes.

B. Meanwhile, in a criminal trial, criminal facts should not be proven only by direct evidence, but also by indirect evidence consistent with logical and empirical rules. Even if indirect evidence does not have full probative value as to a criminal fact individually, if it is deemed that there exists a comprehensive probative value as to the whole evidence, and if it is deemed that there exists a comprehensive probative value as to the whole evidence, it can be acknowledged as criminal facts.

However, in such a case, the conviction is true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt by the judge.