beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 High Court Decision 2575] The defendant is a non-commissioned person.
1. The Defendant, at the end of May 2014, stolen the victim’s 1st floor C store of the building A, which was displayed at the 1st floor of the building A at Sungsung-si, the end of May 2014, using a crepan in which the victim did not exercise due care.
2. On June 4, 2014, around 14:05, at the same place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 1,66,00 in the amount equivalent to KRW 98,00,00 in the market price owned by the victim D, one half of the market price, one half of KRW 68,00 in the market price, and one half of the amount equivalent to KRW 16,00 in the Do.
3. Around 15:03 on June 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed theft by inserting one point in the Brazil tower in the amount of KRW 9,000, the market price of the victim F owned by the victim F, which was displayed at the first floor E store of the building A, Sungsung-si, B, by inserting it in a crepan that the victim does not exercise due diligence.
4. At around 14:50 on June 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by citing the following: (b) the victim H-owned market value of KRW 345,00 in the first floor G store of the building B, the first floor of the building B; (c) the market value of KRW 135,00 in the amount of KRW 135,000 in the market value; and (d) 480,000 in the Doz-owned market value.
[2014 High 2576] On June 22, 2014, the Defendant, at around 17:30 on 22, 2014, stolen, by inserting 1 set of titrts (on a market price of 138,000 won) and titrts (on a market price of 68,000 won), which were displayed for sale in the store “Adong typec” of the building A, B, a building, and one set of titrts (on a market price of 138,00 won).
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each statement of H, D, F, and I;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of seizure and each list of seizure;
1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is against the defendant, and the victim H.