logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.06.01 2018고단972
유가증권위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 26, 2016, the Defendant who forged securities: (a) entered the “F, G, which is located in Ansan-si, the upper end of the promissory note (D) in which, without authority, the D/C office issued by the D/L Press Co., Ltd., for the purpose of exercising the right; (b) entered the amount of the promissory note as KRW 28,750,000; (c) August 26, 2016; and (d) the branch offices of the Gu of the Bank in the Republic of Korea where the payment was made; and (d) entered the name of the Defendant in the column of endorsement of the D/L, and kept the Defendant under his/her name.

G seal was stamped.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged an endorsement under G name, which is a description on the rights and obligations of promissory notes, which are securities.

2. On March 2016, the Defendant: (a) paid to H representative I of H Co., Ltd., who was aware of the forgery as the price for steel materials; (b) exercised a promissory note forged for endorsement as described in paragraph 1 as if it was actually prepared.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of forged promissory notes, photographs and copies thereof Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 214 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of each Article of endorsement) concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 214 (2) and 214 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 217 and 214 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising a promissory note forged for endorsement);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant is admitted to facts charged, and there is no same record as the defendant did and no record of punishment exceeding a fine for the last five years) or more.

arrow