A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates “C” on the 3rd floor of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and Kimpo-si.

No person shall arrange, solicit, induce or compel sexual traffic for business purposes.

Nevertheless, on September 6, 2018, the Defendant explained that the said D, who visited the customer, could engage in sexual traffic, including a mast, was provided with KRW 110,000 from the said D, and gave guidance to the room equipped with bed and bath, and attempted to arrange sexual traffic by having E (F) who is a woman of the fatherland, who is a woman of the motherland, in advance, engage in sexual intercourse in the act of arranging sexual traffic and having sexual intercourse into the above room. However, the said D’s identity revealed by police officers and attempted to commit sexual traffic without engaging in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of crime places;

1. Articles 23 and 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act

1. The assertion;

A. The Defendant only engaged in massage business and did not engage in sexual traffic business.

(b) An illegal naval investigation that a traffic officer pretends to be a customer and attempts to engage in sexual traffic shall be deemed illegal naval investigation;

C. The control police officer did not have the intention to actually engage in sexual traffic, and even if the defendant ordered the control police officer to connect him/her with the female of sexual traffic, it is not possible to engage in sexual traffic itself, and the defendant's act constitutes an impossible crime for

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and investigated by this court as to whether the Defendant was engaged in sexual traffic, the Defendant is deemed to have committed sexual traffic.