(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고단493

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 춘천지방법원 2017.11.29 2017고단493

공용물건손상등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 3, 2017, from around 21:40 to 22:40, the Defendant: (a) at the E restaurant operated by the victim D in Chuncheon City from around March 3, 2017 to around 22:40; (b) at the victim’s inquiry into several persons having a line of duty.

“Isle several ages” for customers who were able to sit in the next table while making sound. “Isle to the age.”

In order to avoid the disturbance of the Si, the Si gu gue, "h" with a large sound, and 16 customers who were in the place of smoking for about one hour, such as the collection of trial expenses, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. The Defendant: (a) was arrested of the police officers dispatched upon receipt of a report due to the same act as referred to in the preceding paragraph as the current criminal; and (b) was detained in the detention room of the Chuncheon Police Station located in Switzerland-ro 61.

피고인은 2017. 3. 4. 05:20 경 위 보호유치 실 안에서, “ 경찰학교에서 뭘 배웠냐,

C. The article was damaged by the noise of C. C. H., snow, and the sound of the toilet string, in his hand, to the extent that the market value of the toilet stirst is low.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement of the defendant (the defendant did not interfere with the defendant's business due to the defendant's disturbance and denies the interference of business, but it is sufficient that the interference of business does not require the result of the interference of business, and the risk of causing the interference of business is likely to occur. Thus, the defendant's interference of business is established as long as the defendant committed a disturbance during the victim's business hours. According to the evidence below, the defendant's disturbance is recognized as a crime of interference of business.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단240

-의정부지방법원 2016.08.26 2016고단1676

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.08 2017고정2107

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.02.15 2015고단1175

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.21 2017노4482