beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On March 31, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Violence) at the Seoul Central District Court (Habitual Violence) and was sentenced to six months for the same crime at the Suwon District Court on November 25, 2010, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 10, 201, and thus the said suspended sentence became null and void. On February 16, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to four months for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Suwon District Court and was sentenced to four times for the same kind of power, such as termination of the execution of the sentence on February 22, 2012, and five times for the same kind of power.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Around April 17, 2014, the Defendant, who violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual assault) expressed his/her desire to “Pash gue” to the victim while engaging in a dispute with the aged E (the age of 48) and drinking at the D Center located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, while drinking alcohol at the D Center located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and expressed his/her face two times in drinking, and made one time the face of the victim one time as a plastic material disease.
Therefore, the defendant, who was found to be the victim's place, frightened by driving away the victim's breath, was frightened in the victim's face, frightened in the victim's face, frightened in the victim's seat, or frighted in the victim's seat.
Accordingly, the defendant habitually assaulted the victim.
2. At around 17:50 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) was arrested and detained in a police box located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul as a flagrant offender; (b) was spawning the flab of G police box, a police officer affiliated with the F police box; (c) was spacing the flab; and (d) tried to throw the spacing box before the police box.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement of E;
1. G. G.