logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.11.26 2020고단7102
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On March 11, 1995, a driver B belonging to the Defendant violated the vehicle operation restriction around 16:13 on March 11, 1995.

2. The part of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8356, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9945, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9974, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9977, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 994, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 9977, Oct. 14, 201; Act No. 88, Feb. 30, 2011).

3. In conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant is publicly announced under the main sentence of Article 440

arrow