Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, on May 18, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 120,000,000 per day for exchange business and exchange business from a person who is not in the name of the company around 09:00 and received KRW 2,000,000 per day for exchange business. The Defendant conspired with the person who was in the name of the company and was in the name of the company to “as a result of a telephone call from customers who are making use of the game, to receive KRW 10,000 per cash 9,00 per 10,000,000 per game 10,000,000 won,” and the Defendant conspired with “as a result of a telephone call from customers who are making use of the game, to 21:00 on the same day, from around 09:0 to around 21:00 on the same day, he/she obtained a free voucher, which is the result obtained through the use of the game product and made a change in the form of cash 9,000,0.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 7, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selected Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the head of illegal games with reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act encourages an excessive speculative spirit, hindering the awareness of sound labor, and thus, it is highly necessary to punish the illegal games with great harmful effects in society and has not

However, the sentence shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all of the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's primary offender, equity with similar cases, the age, sex, and circumstances after the crime.