The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable as to the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. However, the defendant recognized and reflected the crime.

Defendant

Vehicles are covered by comprehensive automobile insurance.

However, even though the Defendant had a record of punishment (6 times a punishment, 6 times a suspended sentence, 2 times a suspended sentence) only with a drinking or non-licensed driving, the Defendant still has no good mind in committing the instant crime.

The victim caused the crime of this case by the crime of this case has reached six persons, and among them, the degree of injury D is significant.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not agree with the victims or endeavor to recover from damage.

In addition, in full view of all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and method of committing the crime, and circumstances after committing the crime, the sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too large. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.