logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.11.19 2015고단931
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a C-A-Wurt Motor Vehicle.

On June 18, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on June 17:25, 2015, and driven the two-lane road in front of the bamboo router, which is located in the router drawing of the router of the router of the router of the routergic drawing, from the tin elementary school, at a speed of about 52.9km from the router Library

There is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by complying with the restricted speed in the children protection zone to a person engaged in driving motor vehicles as a location with a restricted speed of 30 km per hour.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this and neglecting the speed of 22.9 km at a time and neglecting the front city, and did not discover the victim D (the age of 42) driving on the right side from the second apartment on the left side of the running direction to the National Pension Service, and received the first part of the Defendant’s driving car as the front part.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim D such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, the injury to the victim F, who is the same passenger of the same vehicle, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, the injury to the victim G (1) in need of treatment for about two weeks, and the injury to the victim H (4 years of age), and the damage to the victim’s efficiity of the two skins requiring treatment for about two weeks, and the damage to the victim I (2 years of age) in detail, requiring treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The application of medical certificates, etc., public notification of the designation of children protection zones, and replies to the traffic accident investigation request;

1. The proviso to Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts;

arrow