logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.02.11 2013고단6719
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant pays 70,000,000 won to the applicant for compensation by deceit.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The F University Removal Works, which commenced around December 2010, was ordered to be removed by F University. The aforementioned D’s removal work was performed by the Defendant with the knowledge of the specialized company in the process of finding removal work, and the Defendant performed the removal work by the head of G’s site with the license for removal.

On June 2010, the Defendant: (a) indicated that “D will take the responsibility for the entire site of the removal of F University upon the payment of D’s removal work; (b) would bring 80,000,000 won in advance; and (c) displayed the contract for the removal of F University’s removal work to the victim on December 9, 2010; (d) the said contract was already sold to another person at the site of the removal of F University; and (c) as the victim was urged to demand for the nonperformance of the commitment from F University’s neighboring site of the removal of F University, the Defendant was able to receive money from the victim by acquiring money from the victim, with the intention to take the scrap of the removal site of F University.

On January 1, 2011, the Defendant stated that, within the F Campus located in the Hahn from the early police officer, “A public official in special service corporation ordered the victim to I (J) because it does not meet the amount of C President (victim) and thus, will leave the rest of the C President and the cafeteria removal work. The Defendant changed the amount of KRW 70 million with the transfer money of scrap metal to C President, and the removal work shall begin immediately upon the completion of the Gu administration.”

However, the above (State)D submitted a letter of estimate to the F University on January 201, 201, but did not have entered into a contract with the F University on the part of the F University due to the lack of construction cost. Since the construction cost offered by the F University was too low, E was not considered to receive the above removal work.

arrow