The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment, confiscation No. 1, additional collection No. 250,00 won) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and cooperates in the arrest of accomplices is favorable. However, in light of the social harm caused by narcotics and the necessity of eradicating them, severe punishment is required for the crime of narcotics. The crime of this case is that the defendant purchased a penphone on one occasion and administered a penphone on three occasions, and the case is not less complicated, and the defendant committed the crime of this case in the same kind during the suspension period of execution after being sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for a crime of violating the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. on February 5, 2013. In addition, considering the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.