A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving B coaches or automobiles

At around 12:00 on September 23, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle, leading D in Jeju to turn to the right from the direction of the Ara elementary school distance to the Era school.

At the time, there are a central line and four lanes including bus exclusive lanes. In such a case, a person engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to safely drive motor vehicles at the place where transmission is permitted.

Nevertheless, when the defendant drives the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol by negligence while driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.158%, the defendant suffered from the injury of the passenger vehicle front of the F (49 years old) driver's G bus driving under the bus exclusive route in the same direction as the defendant's vehicle side, the victim H (62 years old) of the bus passenger and the victim I (V, 49 years old) of the same passenger are in need of medical treatment for about two weeks respectively; the victim J (V, 56 years old), who is the same passenger, requires medical treatment for about two weeks; and the victim K (V, 28 years old), who is the same passenger, suffers from the injury, such as a string, which requires medical treatment for about three days.

2. On January 19, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 200,000 by the Jeju District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a fine of KRW 4 million by the same court on January 7, 2014.

At around 12:00 on September 23, 2018, the Defendant driven B c or car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.158% from a section of about 200 meters from the front of a restaurant in L to the front of D in C, which is located in C, to the previous road in C.

Accordingly, the defendant violates Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.