logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.10.29 2015노978
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The lower court, within the scope of trial of this court, acquitted the Defendant on the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. among the charges against the Defendant, and convicted the Defendant only on the violation of the Act on the Regulation of Amusement Businesses Affecting Public Morals.

However, since only the defendant appealed the part of the judgment of the court below, and the prosecutor did not appeal the part of the judgment of the court below, the part of the judgment of the court below which was separated and finalized and only the remaining part of the judgment of the court

2. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of two million won) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and reflected against the defendant, and that the defendant did not have the same criminal record.

However, the Defendant’s act of forcing female employees and customers to engage in obscene acts, etc. as the head of the kisp room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room

In addition, taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the offense, the amount of profit gained by the commission of the offense, the circumstances after the offense, etc., and various sentencing conditions shown in the pleading, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow