A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around March 2005, the defendant found C's D's D's D's operation as a customer, and the defendant met C, and continued to live together with C until September 2010.

The Defendant habitually assaulted C from August 206 to January 19, 2010, which had been in a relationship with C, from around August 2006 to around January 19, 201. On February 18, 2011, the Defendant was subject to complaint from C, and was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Violence) at the Daejeon District Court’s official branch office on August 26, 2011, and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on April 24, 2012, and deposited KRW 10 million with C under the pretext of agreement in the course of such trial.

The Defendant, as seen above, retired from the E Middle School that served as a sports teacher due to the complaint and final and conclusive judgment of C, and lost the deposit KRW 10 million, the Defendant was willing to file a false complaint with C to have C punished as if C had stolen the Defendant’s credit card while living together with C and returned the fact that C used the Defendant’s credit card while living together with C, and C used the Defendant’s credit card.

On November 10, 2014, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to the Chungcheongnamnam Police Station located in Pungnam-dong on the Masan-si, stating that “C steals the Defendant’s agricultural card from the Defendant’s home on June 6, 2010, and purchased goods worth KRW 5 million in total using a stolen credit card on June 7, 2010, and stated that C is punished and punished at the above police station investigation and criminal team office on the same day.”

However, in fact, the Defendant assaulted C on June 6, 2010 with C, while having met with C, and then tried to use C with the said Non-C, stating that “I wish to use” was “C with the said Non-C,” and that C did not use the said Non-CC Card. However, it was different from the above facts, even though C did not use the said Non-CC Card by stealing.