1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, a company running the broadcast program production business, produced a program called “B” from December 3, 201 to “B” (hereinafter “instant program”), and supplied the program to the channel that is a general programming channel (hereinafter “channel”).

The program of this case is a documentary document that seeks the improvement of the relationship between the husband and the wife by taking advantage of the respective positions of the husband and the denial against the husband and providing them with expert advice, etc. The cost of producing the program of this case, which the Plaintiff received from the channel, is KRW 34.1 million per time (including value added tax).

[Written Consent on Broadcasting Contribution] - The principal agrees to take photographs for the program as a contributor of the above program.

In addition, I agree that I will actively cooperate in the Program and that the recorded video works will be broadcasted in the Ethical Channels "B" as they are or compilations.

Video works received by the channelA may be broadcasted, transmitted, or utilized by the channelA.

- The amount of the contributing contractual terms - The amount of monetary damages incurred in the photographing upon the completion of the shooting process - The amount of the contribution shall be one million won per husband and wife (tax credit) for each spouse (in particular, before the amount of tax credit) in any case arising from the personal emotional (physically or physically) in the course of shooting and the addition of an outdoor shooting - The amount of monetary damages incurred in the photographing upon the notice of the Audio Broadcasting - The amount of the contribution shall be paid one million won per husband and wife.

나. 피고의 처인 C은 2013. 2. 12. 원고에게 전화하여 피고의 잦은 외도 및 시댁 식구들과의 갈등을 겪고 있어 이 사건 프로그램에 출연을 원한다고 말하였다.

Accordingly, around March 5, 2013, the producers of the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s house after making a telephone conversation with C on the contribution of the instant program, and the Defendant and C are as follows.