The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and eight months, and additional collection of fifty hundred and fifty thousand won) is too unreasonable.

2. Since the investigation agency, the Defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case to the investigation agency, and took into account such factors as: (a) there is hard sense that he will not repeat the crime in the future; and (b) the Defendant actively cooperates with the investigation agency for arresting a drug offender.

However, the defendant has been punished seven times due to the same crime, and in particular, during the period of repeated crime due to the previous conviction as stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the defendant was investigated by entering into the crime of philophone trading, giving and receiving, and medication as stated in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the judgment of the court below and committed the crime of philophone medication as described in paragraph 4 of the judgment of the court below. In full view of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as stated in the arguments and the records of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.