A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a restaurant of Chinese restaurant in the name of Gangwon-gun C, Seocheon-gun D.

1. On September 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) the victim E, Chuncheon District Court enforcement officer, etc., who is the creditor, tried to seize the Fone Starex vehicle owned by the Defendant on the grounds of the written decision of the payment order in the Switzerland District Court 2012 tea No. 62, etc.; (b) the Defendant operated the G E business vehicle to the victim and was adjacent to the victim, on the front of the 3-lane 25-8 Franch-ro, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon District Court 201, etc.

H Tladon XG's left-hand part of the car, and continued to run the Defendant Ethmp car to the right-hand turn, threatening the victim by operating the victim to the right-hand turn.

In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.

2. At the time and place of the above Paragraph 1 above, the injured Defendant inflicted injury on the victim such as dump, bones, tension, etc. in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, such as flaping the victim’s flap with flap, flaping the victim’s flap with flap, and pushing the victim with the victim’s flap XG car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and I;

1. Investigation report (attached to a payment order, etc.);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs and diagnostic instruments;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) (a) and 257(1) (a) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravation of concurrent crimes

1. The gist of the claim is that the Defendant shocked a car with a paton as a paton in the course of parking a marina car, and was engaged in bodily injury by threatening or assaulting the victim, such as facts constituting the crime in the judgment.