A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is a person subject to enlistment in active duty service.

Although the Defendant received a muster notice from the head of the Incheon Regional Military Affairs Administration to enlist in accordance with the 28 association new illness training from November 1, 2016 at the Defendant’s house located in Pyeongtaek-si B and the second floor on September 30, 2016, the Defendant failed to enlist without justifiable grounds by no later than three days after the date of enlistment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of complainants and notice of enlistment in active duty service;

1. Defendant’s written notice (the duty of military service is ultimately to ensure the dignity and value of all citizens as human beings.

Therefore, the State’s criminal punishment against so-called conscientious objectors in accordance with reasonable legislative discretion cannot be deemed as going against Articles 10, 19, and 37(2) of the Constitution, which unfairly infringes on the freedom of conscience, or violates Article 6(1) of the Constitution and Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Such conscientious objection does not constitute “justifiable cause” under Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2004Do2965, Jul. 15, 2004; 2015Do12587, Oct. 29, 2015). statutory application applies

1. As seen earlier, it is inevitable to punish the Defendant as a crime of violating the Military Service Act on criminal facts as stated in the grounds for sentencing under Article 88(1)1 of the pertinent Act.

The sentence of imprisonment with prison labor corresponding to the grounds for exemption from military service is imposed on the defendant, and the period was set by considering the fact that the defendant is the first offender, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the sentencing of the court, etc. (The dwelling of the defendant is specified, and the defendant is not likely to flee in light of his family relation, his attitude to investigate and judge the defendant, etc.).