1. Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and Daa Power Co., Ltd. shall deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate listed in the attached list.

1. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the cause of the claim is in accordance with the procedure of voluntary auction of real estate (hereinafter “instant voluntary auction procedure”) conducted at the court H with respect to the instant building owned by the Nanmank Kank Kank Co., Ltd., and acquired ownership by fully paying the sale price on March 12, 2012, upon receipt of the decision to permit the sale of the instant building. The fact that the Defendants currently occupied the instant building is no dispute between the parties.

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendants are obliged to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff.

2. Determination as to the defenses of Defendant Sungsung Construction

A. The assertion of Defendant Sungsung General Construction is the legitimate lien holder with respect to the instant building.

B. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in evidence Nos. 1 and Nos. 1 through 8 (including virtual numbers) of the judgment, Defendant Sungsung Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”) contracted out the remainder of the construction work of the building of this case from the International Co., Ltd. on June 12, 2006 and carried out the construction work of this case for KRW 600 million. The fact that several auction procedures (this court J, K, and H) progress with respect to the building of this case and the site thereof were conducted on Nov. 30, 2007; on March 1, 2008; on March 3, 2011, and on March 8, 2011, the real estate survey was conducted; on each of the survey reports, Defendant Sungsung Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”); and on each of the following grounds, Defendant Sungsung Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”)’s testimony against the order of auction of this case for construction of this case for the period of 201.