(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.11.25 2020고단2795

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.11.25 2020고단2795

방실침입

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 24, 2020, around 23:24, 2020, the Defendant entered a female toilet in the subway No. 160-ro 160 of the Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, for the victim B and C, despite the existence of the victim B and C in the toilet, and intruded into the room occupied by the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Investigation Report (Reference Party B telephone call) [I] : “A man who does not know of the fact that the conduct was going to go ahead of the front of the third party, coming to the front of the third party,” “I see that I am to go to the front of the third party, I am to go to the front of the third party,” “I am to close the door by going to the front side,” and “I am to go to the front in the front side, and I am to go to go to the front in the front side, and I am to go to go to the front, and I am to go to go to the third party,” and “I am to go to go to the front, and I am to go to the front, because I am to go to the front, I am to go to the front,” “I am to go to the front in the female toilet, I am to see that I am to the other female children’s toilet, as a matter of course, I am in the front.”

1. Investigation report (Inquiry C telephone conversations for reference) (The male’s toilet for female people sent to him/her is called “her, who, although he/she is under the influence of alcohol, was in the female toilet,” and the male takes a diameter of sound when he/she is unbured);

1. The Defendant’s assertion on the Defendant and the defense counsel in the 112 Report (related to video search and investigation before and after the Defendant committed the crime) [the form of “the Defendant’s entrance of a toilet for men”, “the form of putting a female toilet sign”, and “the form of entering a female toilet”, etc.] was the Defendant’s access to a female toilet without awareness, due to the occurrence of the case’s occurrence by dividing three persons into nine soldiers in the week immediately before the occurrence of the case.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.09 2014노4171

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.09.17 2014고정701

-광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.10.13 2016고단354

-수원지방법원 2016.10.21 2015고단3372

-의정부지방법원 2015.12.08 2015노2437