A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle B with detached motor vehicles.

around 08:50 on December 17, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.101% in blood at the upstream line located at the 176 km-si Busan Highway (Seoul)-si (Seoul-si)-si (Seoul-si)-si (hereinafter “Seoul-si”)-si-si (hereinafter “Seoul-si”), and the Defendant was driving the said A-do-ri-si car at a 0.101% alcohol concentration in blood at the upstream line at the Busan-do-si (hereinafter “Seoul-si”) and led the Defendant to drive it at an

It is an expressway with a lot of vehicle traffic, and in this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes and accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this and proceeding at the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and the part of the victim C (28 tax) who is driving in the front direction of the Defendant’s proceeding was driven by the victim C (28 tax). The lower part of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle was the front part of the passenger vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the foregoing occupational negligence, sustained injury to the said victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the light of the trend requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment, and the victim E (28 years old), the victim F (3 years old), and the victim G (1 year old) suffered injury to the brain salvin, etc. without any two situations requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment, and also escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victims, even if the repair cost, such as the exchange of 1,44,418 won, was damaged to the extent that the dalp motor vehicle was damaged to the degree of 1,44,418 won, and the Defendant immediately stopped the dalp motor vehicle and escaped without any necessary measures, such as aiding the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to H;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement related to the I traffic accident;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and written estimate under Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 (1) of the Traffic Act (the point of drinking alcohol) concerning facts constituting an offense, respectively;