The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant was discharged from military service on August 31, 2017, the Defendant was discharged from military service on August 31, 2017, and the victim D (19 years of age) used the same living room as the Defendant, from a company belonging to the same company.

On May 31, 2017, the Defendant committed assault against the victim on the ground that the victim was forced to perform his/her duty once again on the ground that he/she had left a five-fifths of time even though he/she had taken the victim at the above living room where he/she was made at the time when he/she was commercialized.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. The written statement by the police about D (the defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act of this case constitutes a justifiable act that is less vulnerable to the social norms and is not contrary to the social norms, in light of the process and method of the crime acknowledged by the evidence of this case and the situation before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the defendant's act of this case constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate the social norms.

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that no record of criminal punishment exists, contingent crimes are deemed to have been committed, and some of