1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part on the principal lawsuit against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is as follows.

1. Scope of the ruling of the political party;

A. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiffs asserted the principal lawsuit against Defendant D’s sexual assault and defamation, and under the premise that Defendant D’s ability to assume responsibility is recognized, pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act, the Defendants sought damages against Defendant F and E pursuant to Article 755(1) of the Civil Act on the premise that Defendant F and E are not recognized as Defendant D’s ability to assume responsibility. ② Defendant F and E’s tort was asserted, and Defendant F and E claimed damages against Defendant F and E pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act. The Defendants claimed damages against the Plaintiffs by counterclaim.

B. The first instance court accepted part of the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants, and dismissed the defendants' counterclaims against the defendants as follows.

The grounds for the separate claim are as follows: (a) Defendant F, and E, jointly with Defendant F, who is a minor with the ability to take responsibility, jointly with Defendant F, and with Defendant F, and with Defendant F, and E, who jointly with Defendant F, and with Defendant F, the preliminary Defendant F, and E, to dismiss the damages for the tort of defamation; (b) KRW 80 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won due to the violation of supervisory duties under Article 755 of the Civil Act; and (c) Defendant F, and E, who jointly with Defendant F, cannot take responsibility pursuant to Article 753 of the Civil Act; and (d) if Defendant D, with respect to Defendant F, and E, are deemed to have the ability to take responsibility pursuant to Article 753 of the Civil Act, Defendant F, and E, who did not claim damages for the tort of Defendant F, and KRW 30,000,00,00,000,00).

However, Article 755, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code is amended.