1. The defendant's KRW 20,000,000 and about this, 5% per annum from April 9, 2020 to October 27, 2020 to the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 18, 2003, the Plaintiff married with C on July 18, 2003, and 1 South and North women were generated between C.

B. The Defendant came to work from April 5, 2018 at a company accompanying C, and the Defendant and C came to know that they had worked in the same block with the fourth floor of the company’s D building around November 2018.

C. On March 26, 2019, the Defendant and C had suppered with the workplace club E, and had supperous relationship from September 2019.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 2, and 16, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The plaintiff's assertion that C gave emotional distress to C with knowledge of the fact that C was the father-Nam, and thus, C is obliged to pay consolation money with KRW 50 million and delay damages.

B. Determination 1) In full view of the following circumstances, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant committed unlawful acts, such as having sexual intercourse with C, even though having knowledge of the existence of spouse C from September 2019 to May 2020. As a result, it is clear in light of the empirical rule that the Plaintiff, who is the spouse of C, was suffering from mental pain, the Defendant is liable for damages caused by the tort against the Plaintiff. If the purport of the entire pleadings is added to the entries in the evidence Nos. 10 and 11, the Defendant sent the phone to the Plaintiff on February 10, 2020, and cut off the phone, and then the Plaintiff and the C dialogueed as follows in the Kakao Kao Stockholm on the same day.

08:55 Plaintiff Doll, who sent the call time 08:5, is flickly flickly, so that flick to flickly flick.

09:00 C 뭘 솔직하게 얘길해 09:00 원고 전화주세요.

09:01C Doz. 09:13 Doz. Doz.

09:13 C 13 C 09:19 The plaintiff company will be able to prepare for the future.

Sectoral Maciopia

According to the above facts, the defendant seems to have been aware of the fact that he had a spouse at the time of February 10, 2020.

B. A.