logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.08.20 2015고합28
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant appears to have committed a crime against the victim J in a bad credit and bad faith that is unable to open a financial account under his/her own name and that there is no asset in his/her own name, 3.2 billion won from the bank without his/her own investment and her “P” written indictment appears to be a clerical error in K.

The loan of KRW 50 million from L with each loan of KRW 600,000 from L, purchased and operated the NA brokerage hall in the Sosan City M with the trading price of KRW 4 billion, but did not generate any profit, so there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if it borrowed money from another person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant came to know through the introduction of the Dozin in 201, stating, “The money was made to make an investment in the wedding hall of Busan, and invested in the Dozinco in China. The Kimchi was supplied to the North KoreanO, and the descendants of the Chinese executives of the 3rd level Chinese level, which caused revolution in China, are also well known.”

On August 3, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim of Nwa Holdings Holdings located in Pasan City, stating that “If the funds are insufficient to purchase Nwa Holdings Holdings located in Pasan City M, the Defendant would repay the amount of KRW 160 million to the victim, not later than December 3, 2012, the Defendant would repay the amount of KRW 160,000,000,000,000 from the victim, as the borrowed money was given by the victim on September 3, 2012.”

B. On October 12, 2012, the Defendant: “Around October 12, 2012, the Defendant borrowed money from the Defendant to the Defendant to pay KRW 300 million with the funds for the operation of the wedding hall without the molding until October 27, 2012”; and the Defendant received KRW 300 million from the victim for the borrowed money at that time.”

C. On April 30, 2013, the Defendant loaned the Defendant a loan to pay various taxes, such as public charges, which was paid, to the Plaintiff on April 30, 2013, even if the Defendant borrowed KRW 230 million to the Defendant, the amount that has not been paid so far on May 15, 2013.

arrow