The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the Defendant, as the representative director C (ju) in Gyeonggi-nam-si B, is an employer who runs sanitary management business using nine full-time workers.

As shown in the attached Form below.

2. Article 109(1) and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act; Article 44 subparag. 1 and Article 9 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act; Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act; Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits; Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits; Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits; and Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Litigation Act on the dismissal of a public prosecution for all of the above workers.