All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the difference between the victim D and the first police officer from November 2005 to January 2014.

E is the wife of the victim, and the F is the wife of the victim.

The Defendant: (a) demanded several times to repay the sum of KRW 64,300,000 that the Defendant lent 49 times prior to organizing a ties; (b) around May 26, 2014, the Defendant had expressed the Defendant’s “debt statement” arranged by the victim through “Kaphone Kakao Kakao” and had the Defendant expressed the Defendant’s “debt statement” as the Defendant sent the Defendant’s “debt statement,” which was not repaid to the victim, to the victim’s family member, with the intention of not paying the borrowed money to the victim.

On May 27, 2014, the Defendant sent a victim’s Kakao Kakao Kakao 20:31, using a mobile phone, by sending the victim’s her parent F photograph via “Kao Kakao Stockholm”, and the Defendant threatened the victim with the message that “I am am cryp, or am chyphere, you am chyphere, you am e, you am e, you am e, if you were you you you am, and you am e, you am e, you you am., you am.

B. On May 28, 2014, at around 02:00, the Defendant sent the victim’s Kakao Kakao Messen’s cell phone, using a mobile phone, with the victim’s Kakao Kakao Messen’s pictures and family pictures, and asked the victim whether the Defendant sent the victim’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s her husband’s son, and then threatened the victim by sending the message

C. On July 14, 2014, at around 11:56, the Defendant sent to the victim a message, “Isn't have to do her flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium, flusium flusium flusium, flusium flusium, and flusium flusium flusium.”

The Defendant on July 17, 2014.