(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.10.14 2015가합76226

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.10.14 2015가합76226

소유권이전등기

Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s shares of 1/10 of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (1/2 of each Defendants’ shares).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Both the Plaintiff and the Defendants were children of the networkF (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the Deceased died on August 18, 2015.

At the time of the death of the deceased, there are each real estate listed in the attached list, and there is no passive inherited property.

B. On August 3, 2011, a notary public located on the 3 and 4th floor of the Yongsan-gu G Building in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, the deceased was present at the law firm H office, and the attorney-at-law in charge of authentication I heard from the deceased that “the deceased will will be bequeathed to the plaintiff, and the executor of will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will will be the plaintiff,” and written a testament No. 515 of the document (No. 1; hereinafter “the will will will document of this case”) in the manner of signing and sealing each of the deceased and the witness after recognizing the accuracy thereof.

C. Meanwhile, upon the death of the deceased, the Plaintiff and the Defendants respectively completed the registration of ownership transfer as the receipt of No. 222692 on November 12, 2015, on the grounds of “Inheritance on August 18, 2015,” with respect to one-fifth of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet as indicated in the separate sheet.

[Grounds for recognition] The descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4 and 8 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination of the parties' arguments

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 of the parties concerned comprehensively bequeathed each real estate indicated in the separate sheet, which is all the deceased’s property, based on the testament of this case. As such, upon the death of the deceased, the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of all the real estate indicated in the separate sheet as a matter of course. The Defendants infringed the Plaintiff’s ownership as much as exceeding the Defendants’ share in the legal reserve of inheritance by completing the registration of ownership transfer for each real estate listed in the separate

Therefore, the defendants are attached to the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.13 2016가합70706

-서울고등법원 2017.07.19 2017나2013074

-서울고등법원(춘천) 2017.09.13 2015나2824

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.17 2012가합25550

-수원지방법원 2021.02.03 2019가합28662