logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.22 2016고단2007
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

On October 18, 1990, the defendant entered into a check contract with the branch office of the bank in Korea under the name of the representative director B and traded over the check.

around September 2012, the Defendant issued a copy of the check number “E”, face value “10,00,000”, and “1 November 1, 2012,” the date of issuance, at the office of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 101, the check number “E”, “E”, “10,000,000”, and offered the said check to the said bank on November 2, 2012, within the period for presentation for payment by the holder, but did not receive the deposit shortage.

Judgment

The crime of this case is a crime falling under Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act, or a case where the issuer or the originator of a check collects a check pursuant to Article 2(4). Since the check was recovered as of July 20, 2016, the prosecution of this case is dismissed.

arrow