(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.03.24 2015나33810

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.03.24 2015나33810

물품대금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 2, 3, 101, 680, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 10, 10, 10, 10, 100, 100, 3, 3, 1, and 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 3, and 420, 3, 200, 3, 4,000, 3,000, 27,000, 27,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,

2. The defendant first asserts that the amount of the additional determination is five million won if the defendant deducteds the total amount of 7,772,030 won from the amount of the embezzlement from the defendant's unpaid payment, as the employee belonging to the plaintiff, who received alcoholic beverages from the plaintiff from January 2004 to May 2004, when he received alcoholic beverages from the plaintiff, for which he received alcoholic beverages from the plaintiff, he arbitrarily consumed and embezzled some of them without delivering it to the plaintiff.

In addition to the purport of the argument in the statement No. 3, the plaintiff's employee was allowed to collect a total of KRW 7,772,030 from January 2004 to May 2004, and embezzled by arbitrarily consuming it. However, the defendant signed the statement of alcoholic beverage sales to the purport that the balance of claims as of February 27, 2012, when several years have elapsed since the above date, is KRW 23,886,80, as of February 27, 2012, and the defendant signed the statement of alcoholic beverage sales to the purport that the balance of claims as of February 27, 2012, as mentioned above, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by adding witness D's testimony to the statement No. 3, that is, the credit ledger prepared by the plaintiff, namely, the statement "03" on the left-hand side of the credit ledger prepared by the plaintiff, is deemed to be a clerical error in the year 2013.

It seems that the balance of the claim is 24,144,80 won and the defendant signed and sealed, and there was no mentioning about the embezzlement.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-수원지방법원성남지원 2016.12.29 2016가단25439

-서울고등법원 2015.10.23 2014나2043845

-서울북부지방법원 2018.04.06 2017나3374

-대전고등법원 2017.02.03 2016나675

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.11.20 2018고정315