1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3:

The plaintiff is the owner of C Excavation Cuter (hereinafter referred to as "the so-called "the so-called the so-called "the so-called") and the defendant operates a gas station.

B. On July 14, 2013, the Plaintiff settled KRW 470,000 of the fuel to be put in the digging season of this case by credit card.

C. On July 15, 2013, the Defendant: (a) carried oil on the tank lorri vehicle; and (b) operated the tank lorri vehicle at the site where the excavation search period in the instant case is located. D.

On July 15, 2013, 140m was put to the extent of 140m on July 15, 2013, and it was found that it was done at the time of gasing in the instant digging machine.

E. The petroleum injecting machine of this case is located in the vertical vertical form on the upper part of the digging machines. While the Plaintiff’s employees D write U.S. and the starting part of the digging machines of this case are suffering from the starting part of the digging machines, the lid lids of the oil in the digging machines of this case were stored directly in the digging machines of this case by using gas station equipment after a year.

F. As a result of the maintenance, the parts located in fuel Rasing in the fuel tank with water tea have been damaged. This is because the parts located in fuel Rasing in the fuel tank were damaged.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff paid KRW 5,032,830 as the repair cost of the digging machines of this case because the defendant oil containing water in the digging machines of this case was oil, and paid KRW 5,032,830 as the repair cost of the digging machines of this case, and KRW 200,000 as the transportation cost for repairing the digging machines of this case was required. At the time of the accident of this case, the loss equivalent to KRW 470,00 as the oil cost due to all smelling oil for repairing the digging machines of this case, the loss equivalent to KRW 12,767,00 as the oil cost due to all smelling oil, and the total loss amounting to KRW 18,462,830 (=5,032,830 won), total amounting to KRW 200,000,000, KRW 12,767,000). The defendant suffered a loss equivalent to KRW 12,836,2830.