logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.03.18 2013고단3401
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매광고)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an operator of Songpa-gu Seoul building C and a sexual traffic business establishment in the first floor, and the defendant B is an employee working as the head of the business office of the above business establishment.

1. The Defendants conspired with others on October 13, 2013 to November 22:30, 2013, and arranged sexual traffic by allowing female employees and male grandchildren to engage in a similar sexual intercourse that uses part of their body.

2. Defendant A advertised a sexual traffic business establishment by inserting the location of the said D business establishment from October 13, 2013 to November 22:30, 2013 on the Internet website from the said D’s Internet site to November 22:30, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Defendant B’s statement in the second trial record;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer concerning F, G, H, and I;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Internet advertisement screen pictures and photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 20 (1) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 20 (1) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Defendant B who has selected imprisonment: Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishments of the above two crimes);

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have the same force to the Defendants, and Defendant B is an initial criminal without a previous criminal record, the operating period is not long, and all other circumstances are considered.

arrow